Last week we posted our story about Half Moon Bay City Councilman Joaquin Jimenez’s May 23 encounter with San Mateo County Sheriff’s deputies. I knew it would cause a ruckus. That’s because your opinion of what went down likely depends on your perspective. And your perspective is influenced — though not determined — by your race.

For those who haven’t seen the story, the facts go something like this: Jimenez, who was leaving a local ranch and, by his own admission, a bit disheveled, rode his bicycle north on Main Street during the annual Holy Ghost Festival. As he passed the excitement at the I.D.E.S. Hall, he took his hands off the handlebars to take a cellphone video of the proceedings. He continued north on Main Street, unaware that a Sheriff’s deputy was following him until he heard a blast from the siren. He says he was admonished, though not cited, for failing to stop at a stop sign. Feeling, as he put it, “this deputy profiled me as dirty Mexican,” he went back to the I.D.E.S. Hall to speak with a Sheriff’s sergeant.

Now, to fully understand Jimenez’s position, it helps to understand some history. I first met Jimenez in 2015, when he told us that he, his father and his son were photographed and briefly detained by Sheriff’s deputies during the Half Moon Bay Art and Pumpkin Festival. The Sheriff’s Office told them that the Jimenezes earned special attention from the Crime Suppression Unit because they wore T-shirts memorializing a family friend whom authorities say also happened to be a gang member. Over the course of the ensuing years, Jimenez (like the rest of us) has thought a lot about the intersection of race and policing.

As a result, he has been thinking about policing reform in the city he represents. He is one of two City Council members who have put their names to a rather extraordinary document they hope to present to the full council this week. (The meeting occurred after Review print deadlines on Tuesday.) The document, titled “The Jimenez-Rarback Report on Policing and Public Safety in Half Moon Bay,” posits a new paradigm in which armed response to every emergency call in the city is replaced with an array of choices, from deployment of mental health counselors to a beach safety unit to armed deputies.

It is somewhat ironic, then, that he was stopped by an armed deputy for riding his bicycle through a stop sign.

The proposal outlined in the report deserves a full hearing and vigorous debate in the community. This column isn’t that. This is merely meant to point out that your perspective on the Jimenez traffic stop is likely colored by the color of your skin and how that has affected your life. If you think that we live in a color-blind society and that we are all treated equally — whether we are white and wearing Spandex shorts atop a $5,000 racing bike or are “a dirty Mexican” on a lesser means of conveyance — you are living in a world I don’t recognize. It is simply not true. The evidence is overwhelming, from the Stanford Open Policing Project, which considered more than 39 million traffic stops in California and “found significant racial disparities in policing,” to a Los Angeles Times analysis of data that found Black and Latino people are more likely to be searched following a stop but less likely to have contraband than white people.

All you have to do to see the differing ways we react to these things is to follow the Half Moon Bay Review on Facebook. The comments to our story there are telling. Overwhelmingly, defenders of the Sheriff’s Office appear to be white; those who think Jimenez was targeted appear to be primarily people of color for whom such discrimination is commonplace.

Sadly, none of this is new. One thing has changed, though. Increasingly, people like Jimenez are seeking public office and finding themselves in a position to effect change. Time will tell whether his constituents are ready for it.

— Clay Lambert

Recommended for you

(4) comments


Unfortunately, there are few (if any) news sources trusted by both halves of the divided America and as a result when sources like the Los Angeles Times reports an "undeniable" fact half the country denies it simply because the Los Angeles Times is the source.

Problems like this will only be solved (or to choose a more modest outcome, improved) when one half of the county figures out how to argue constructively with the other.

It all starts with respect for the opposing position and the person taking that position.

Another Concerned Citizen

Hm, anyone who doesn't agree with you is (a) a racist (of course), (b) ignorant, (c) lazy, and (d) presumed to be an effeminate male--so insults are all the rational argument you need to refute them. I couldn't help noticing that Clay also thought the presumed race of people who opposed the proposal was a relevant thing that everyone should know when considering their arguments. Woke-ness seems to infect everything in HMB, as the proposal itself proves.

Another Concerned Citizen

To those who are just hearing about this, the proposal is to effectively defund the police who serve HMB and instead send social workers, homeless advocates and the like to the majority of 911 calls that police respond to now. I suggest that nobody waste their time on this without first reading all the comments on the thread on Next Door about it


But there is a quicker way to decide if this is worth your time-- the same link has a link to the actual proposal, the very first line of which says:

"The policing model in use today to deal with many public safety issues is similar to the model invented in the 19th century to capture escaped slaves and either punish them or return them to their owners. The police of today are the direct antecedents of yesteryears’ slave hunters."

If that first sentence causes you to gag and resist the urge to throw up, don't waste your time on it. If it causes you to nod want to protest to in favor because of, well, racism! then congratulations, you are fully woke and this is for you.

The Review won't let me post the actual link to the Next Door thread because it looks like spam to their computer. It is the thread by David Eblovi entitled "The Jimenez-Rarback Report on Policing In Half Moon Bay Has Just Been Released!"


Or, option 3: YOu read that and you go "Holy S__t!! I did not know that. I wonder if it is true?? ANd you use the ridiculous power of the internets to do your own research and come to your own conclusions, or listening to anonymous racist yahoos who post one here pretending rationality!!

I know it. You know it. You can learn anything you want in today's world if you want. Too bad Another Concerned Citizen hasn't figured this out yet. (Equally that he doesn't have the male parts to use his real name. I say male because he is, without question, male.)(And for those types of male their parts are, ahem, very important to them...)

Cheers Bill-


Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

More Stories