News : City should stop stalling El Granada pipeline : Half Moon Bay Review, California
Home News Opinion Sports Talkabout Obituaries Community Classifieds Calendar Archives About Us Ad Rates

City should stop stalling El Granada pipeline

By Jim Larimer--Matter of Opinion
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, Jul 05, 2006 - 04:22:00 pm PDT

On June 20 two colleagues from the Coastside County Water District Board of Directors and I spoke before the Half Moon Bay City Council to alert them to the delay being imposed by the city's Planning Department on the completion of the El Granada pipeline replacement project.

A Coastal Development Permit for this pipeline was issued on Jan. 28, 1999. That year this project became the political cause celebre of the no-growth political faction when Carol Cupp appealed it to the California Coastal Commission. Later that year she, Eva Coleman, and Eleanor Wittrup were elected to the CCWD board and then asked the Coastal Commission to find substantial issues with the permit.

Two years later Chris Mickelsen and I were elected to the CCWD board and at our first meeting demanded that the board request that the dispute be resolved at the Coastal Commission. Two years later the Coastal Commission found no merit in the appeals and ordered the CDP to be re-issued. The project was to be constructed in three phases; the first phase is now complete. Phase 2 and 3 are now at a stage where they need only CDPs to move forward.

In September of 2005, CCWD submitted its request for a CDP for Phase 2; now approaching a year later we still do not have it. The city Planning Department requested additional biological studies although all of the studies sufficient to issue the permit had been completed in 1998.

At the June 20 meeting, Planning Director Jack Liebster stated the water district agreed that the city had the right to request more studies. We do agree, but the issue is not the right to request more costly and delaying studies but the need for these studies.

The CDP issued upon the Coastal Commission's resolution of the Cupp appeal did not require any new studies. Construction of Phase 1 was completed in June 2005, two months later, Liebster wanted to restart the costly and slow process that had been completed by January 1999.

Many individuals who have had to request permits from the city's Planning Department have found themselves embroiled in lengthy bureaucratic procedures and costly studies to gain a building permit. We should see this for what it is, a political exercise of abusive executive power at the hands of individuals who oppose almost any new development within our community.

These policies have resulted in homeowners being forced to live for years with stalled remodeling projects, a requirement that model airplane hobbyists must get a CDP to fly their planes, and - in the case of the water district - another costly delay of a needed infrastructure renewal project.

The City Council should tell the Planning Director to stop exercising pointless executive powers to needlessly hassle citizens and sister agencies just because he can. The Planning Department and its director should serve the public not impede it.



Jim Larimer is a member of the CCWD Board of Directors and a resident of Miramar.

Want to talk about this story? Start a topic on Talkabout.

Reader Poll

Calendar

Upcoming Events:

Weather